1–10 of 141 results

Selecting the Right Frame Worksheet

This worksheet can be used as a guide to select the right frame for your audience and communication goals.

Source

PHRASES

2021

Putting it All Together: Using Strategic Messaging and Framing - Course #3

This course focuses on how to use strategic messaging tools simultaneously with framing tools to motivate cross-sector partners and other non-public health experts to support public health interventions, programs, and policies. The strategic messaging tools that are explored include unique value proposition, narrative structure, one-minute messages, and the public health story map. The entire training is expected to take 60 minutes to complete. There are no prerequisites.

Source

Region IV Public Health Training Center

2021

Using the PHRASES Framing Tools - Course #2

This course focuses on the 10 PHRASES framing recommendations and four framing tools. It provides a deep dive into the tools and finishes with an interactive piece to show learners how to use the framing tools to build and sustain cross-sector partnerships. The entire training is expected to take 30 minutes to complete. There are no prerequisites.

Source

Region IV Public Health Training Center

2021

Overview of PHRASES Training - Course #1

This training provides an introduction to how productive framing and messaging can improve partnerships and overall health outcomes, and an overview of the tools and strategies PHRASES provides to improve communication to other sectors. The entire training is expected to take 30 minutes to complete. There are no prerequisites.
Source

Region IV Public Health Training Center

2021

Sample Governance: Cacade Pacific Action Decision Making Flow Chart

The Cascade Pacific Action Alliance (CPAA), operating in the Central Western Washington region, was created to improve community health and safety while advancing the Triple Aim: improving the patient experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing per capita health care costs. This governance structure is similar in function but different in structure of typical governance structures, focusing solely on the decision making flow. The CPAA is unique in that it aims to reach consensus on key decisions, which means that every party does not need to fully agree on all parts of an issue, but they need to be able to live with it. Members are encouraged to adopt collective positions and recommendations that support a joint action model.

Source

Cascade Pacific Action Alliance, PHRASES

2017

Sample Governance: Harris County BUILD Health Partnership

Partners in Harris County sought to reduce food insecurity in North Pasadena, Texas, a predominantly Hispanic, working-class suburb of Houston. They came together to create a community-supported food system to increase knowledge, demand, and availability of healthy food among the community. This is the governance structure they used to define the roles and responsibilities, relationships, and agency leads for the executive, backbone, and cross-cutting committees, all of which were made up of non-profit organization, hospital/health system, and health department partners.

Source

BUILD Health Challenge, PHRASES

2018

Sample MOU: Healthy Hospital Initiative

504HealthNet created the Healthy Hospitality Initiative to increase access to care for hospitality workers in New Orleans. Clinics used this agreement to opt-in for the project, which also includes strengthening their capacity and infrastructure through quality improvement activities so that they can better serve hospitality workers and their families. This MOU serves the pupose of confirming clinic participation and outlines participant expectations.

Source

504HealthNet, PHRASES

Sample MOU: Healthy Homes East Bank

Partners in Des Moines Iowa came together to improve the lives and health of children living in the East Bank region of Des Moines under the name Healthy Homes East Bank (HHEB). HHEB looks specifically to identify children experiencing chronic pediatric asthma symptoms, remediate the situtation with supportive services and improvement of household conditions, and follow up with the household to determine the impact of the intervention on the child’s conditions. This MOU is used to signify the commitment of partners to HHEB and discuss the expectations of the partners.

Source

BUILD Health Challenge, PHRASES

2018

Sample MOU: Clark County Public Health Department and Vancouver Public Schools

The Clark County Public Health Department partnered with the Vancouver Public Schools to support high-risk youth in the City of Vancouver. This MOU was created to define the roles and responsibilities of the public health department and the school system in providing Adverse Childhood Experiences and Resilience (ACEs) education to school staff, administrators, and volunteers.

Source

Clark County Public Health Department, PHRASES

Sample Logic Model: Tennessee Livability Collaborative

Seventeen state agencies in Tennessee came together to improve the prosperity, quality of life, and health of Tennesseans in the areas of policy, funding, and programming. This collaborative focuses on the following state priorities: Jobs & Economic Development, Education & Workforce Development, Health & Welfare, Fiscal Strength & Efficient Government, and Public Safety. This is the logic model they used to describe how their inputs would lead to long-term change.

Source

Tennessee Department of Health, PHRASES

2019